Missing Treatments
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
- Vol. 28 (1), 82-95
- https://doi.org/10.1198/jbes.2009.07161
Abstract
This article analyzes the problem of identifying a treatment effect with imperfect observability of the treatment received by the population. Imperfect observability may be due to item/survey nonresponse or to noncompliance with randomly assigned treatments. I derive sharp worst-case bounds that are a function of the available prior information on the distribution of missing treatments. Under the assumption of monotone treatment response, I show that prior information on the distribution of missing treatments is not necessary to get sharp informative bounds. I illustrate the results with an empirical analysis of drug use and employment using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Asymptotic Properties for a Class of Partially Identified ModelsEconometrica, 2008
- Estimation and Confidence Regions for Parameter Sets in Econometric ModelsEconometrica, 2007
- Nonparametric bounds on the returns to language skillsJournal of Applied Econometrics, 2005
- Nonparametric Analysis of Randomized Experiments with Missing Covariate and Outcome DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2000
- Censoring of outcomes and regressors due to survey nonresponse: Identification and estimation using weights and imputationsJournal of Econometrics, 1998
- Drug use, drug abuse, and labour market outcomesHealth Economics, 1998
- Bounds on Treatment Effects From Studies With Imperfect ComplianceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1997
- Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental VariablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Identification and Robustness with Contaminated and Corrupted DataEconometrica, 1995
- Does Drug Use Lower Wages?ILR Review, 1992