Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies: Approaches for Evaluating the Instrumental Variable Assumptions
- 12 January 2012
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 175 (4), 332-339
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr323
Abstract
As with other instrumental variable (IV) analyses, Mendelian randomization (MR) studies rest on strong assumptions. These assumptions are not routinely systematically evaluated in MR applications, although such evaluation could add to the credibility of MR analyses. In this article, the authors present several methods that are useful for evaluating the validity of an MR study. They apply these methods to a recent MR study that used fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) genotype as an IV to estimate the effect of obesity on mental disorder. These approaches to evaluating assumptions for valid IV analyses are not fail-safe, in that there are situations where the approaches might either fail to identify a biased IV or inappropriately suggest that a valid IV is biased. Therefore, the authors describe the assumptions upon which the IV assessments rely. The methods they describe are relevant to any IV analysis, regardless of whether it is based on a genetic IV or other possible sources of exogenous variation. Methods that assess the IV assumptions are generally not conclusive, but routinely applying such methods is nonetheless likely to improve the scientific contributions of MR studies.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Examining Overweight and Obesity as Risk Factors for Common Mental Disorders Using Fat Mass and Obesity-Associated (FTO) Genotype-Instrumented Analysis: The Whitehall II Study, 1985-2004American Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- Power and instrument strength requirements for Mendelian randomization studies using multiple genetic variantsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Mendelian Randomization for Strengthening Causal Inference in Observational StudiesPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2010
- Sex Hormone–Binding Globulin and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Women and MenNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Does Greater Adiposity Increase Blood Pressure and Hypertension Risk?Hypertension, 2009
- How Does Body Fat Influence Bone Mass in Childhood? A Mendelian Randomization ApproachJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2009
- Mendelian Randomisation and Causal Inference in Observational EpidemiologyPLoS Medicine, 2008
- Lifelong Reduction of LDL-Cholesterol Related to a Common Variant in the LDL-Receptor Gene Decreases the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease—A Mendelian Randomisation StudyPLOS ONE, 2008
- Alcohol Intake and Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review Implementing a Mendelian Randomization ApproachPLoS Medicine, 2008
- A Common Variant in the FTO Gene Is Associated with Body Mass Index and Predisposes to Childhood and Adult ObesityScience, 2007