Abstract
The measurement errors of resistivity and Hall coefficient in the van der Pauw technique due to contact lead size or lead placement errors is calculated for square and cloverleaf‐shaped samples, and compared to the results for a simple circular disk. Both the square and the cloverleaf greatly reduce these errors, compared to the circular sample shape. Another source of measurement error, sample inhomogeneity, is also analyzed, and it is shown that the error introduced by inhomogeneities is proportional to E2 in the region of the inhomogeneity. Consequences of these results are discussed.

This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit: