Technical reliability of the CSA activity monitor: The EarlyBird Study
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- applied sciences
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 34 (9), 1533-1537
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200209000-00022
Abstract
METCALF, B.S., J.S.H. CURNOW, C. EVANS, L.D. VOSS, and T.J. WILKIN. Technical reliability of the CSA activity monitor: The EarlyBird Study. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 34, No. 9, pp. 1533–1537, 2002. Purpose To evaluate the technical performance of the CSA accelerometer-based activity monitor. Methods Twenty-three CSA monitors were subjected to intra- and inter-instrument variability tests by controlled trials using a motorized turntable. The CSA monitor measures change in acceleration, and precision was tested by producing sinusoidal variations in speed around two fixed baseline speeds (fast and medium). The angle of the monitor to the line of force along the radius of the turntable was varied using tilted blocks. Three sets of tests were carried out. 1. Intra-instrument variability: seven monitors were tested three times in each of the four quadrants. 2. All 23 monitors were used for inter-instrument tests. 3. The effects of tilt at 15°, 30°, and 45° were carried out on six monitors. Results Intra-instrument coefficients of variation (CV) never exceeded 2% for fast or medium speed and achieved ‘between run’ intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.92 and 0.84 respectively. There were no significant differences between the monitors in terms of repeatability (fast:P = 0.97, medium:P = 0.77). Although there were significant differences between monitors in terms of mean score, inter-instrument variability did not exceed 5% at either speed. Inter-batch ICCs ranged from 0.87 to 0.98 for fast and from 0.71 to 0.99 for medium. The angle test results corresponded closely to those predicted theoretically, with a loss in mean score of only 6% when the monitor was tilted from 0° to 15°. Conclusion The CSA monitor provides a precise tool for measuring changes in acceleration in laboratory settings. Technically, the device performs well, and is likely to prove a useful tool in the assessment of physical activity in children and adults.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The obesity epidemic in young childrenBMJ, 2001
- Prevalence of overweight and obese children between 1989 and 1998: population based series of cross sectional studiesBMJ, 2001
- Assessment of Physical Activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., Accelerometer: Laboratory versus Field ValidationResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000
- Relationship between activity levels, aerobic fitness, and body fat in 8- to 10-yr-old childrenJournal of Applied Physiology, 1999
- Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analysesClinical Rehabilitation, 1998
- Preschool Physical Activity Level and Change in Body Fatness in Young Children: The Framingham Children's StudyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1995
- Obesity in Britain: gluttony or sloth?BMJ, 1995
- Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CCA) activity monitorMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1995
- Physical activity assessment in children and adolescentsCritical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 1993
- Validation of a simple mechanical accelerometer (pedometer) for the estimation of walking activityEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 1987