The value of clinical data scoring systems: Are traditional hip scoring systems adequate to use in evaluation after total hip surgery?
- 31 December 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 14 (8), 1024-1029
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90020-7
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Patient-Specific IndexThe Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1997
- Demographic biases found in scoring instruments of total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1996
- LONG-TERM COMPARISON OF CHARNLEY AND STANMORE DESIGN TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTSThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1996
- A statistical analysis of hip scoresThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1993
- Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systemsThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1990
- The State of Outcome Research: Are We on Target?New England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- MEASUREMENT OF PAINThe Lancet, 1974
- HIP ASSESSMENT: A COMPARISON OF NINE DIFFERENT METHODSThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1972
- THE LONG-TERM RESULTS OF LOW-FRICTION ARTHROPLASTY OF THE HIP PERFORMED AS A PRIMARY INTERVENTIONThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1972
- Traumatic Arthritis of the Hip after Dislocation and Acetabular FracturesThe Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1969