On the stimulus and response in pursuit tracking.
- 1 January 1957
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 53 (3), 189-194
- https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043798
Abstract
Pursuit tracking in 1 dimension was studied in 1 experiment with intermittent glimpses of the display pointers. Tracking was most accurate when both pointers could be seen all the time. It was less accurate when the input pointer was invisible than when the response pointer was visible, and least accurate when neither pointer could be seen. Sudden discrete corrections of misalignment followed only a minority of the glimpses of the invisible pointer(s). In a 2d experiment, tracking a fast sinusoidal input for 5 sec. with the eyes closed was sometimes as accurate as normal tracking with the eyes open. This latter condition gave rise to a continuous cyclical response, which appeared to be adjusted only relatively infrequently to improve its match with the input.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The frequency response of skilled subjects in a pursuit tracking task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955
- Effect of frequency of target intermittence upon tracking.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955
- Learning a rate of movement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954
- THE INTERMITTENCY OF CONTROL MOVEMENTS AND THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD1The British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 1948