Drivers' biased perceptions of the adverse consequences of drink‐driving
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Drug and Alcohol Review
- Vol. 15 (1), 39-45
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09595239600185651
Abstract
The decision to drink and drive may involve the subjective process of weighing the perceived risks of adverse consequences of the behaviour against perceived utility components. Deterrence theory proposes that an individual will refrain from drink-driving if the perceived chances of experiencing negative outcomes associated with the behaviour are high. Previous research has demonstrated that there may be a mechanism of judgemental bias which influences individuals' perceived probabilities of rarely occurring events. In general driver age and gender have been shown independently to be both indicative and non-indicative for the operation of the bias in terms of subjective perceptions of driver skill, safety and accident involvement. Little evidence has been presented to describe the nature of the bias in the specific domain of drink-driving. Responses from mole than 1000 UK drivers were examined to establish whether a system of bias operated for judgements of the likelihood of experiencing several possible adverse consequences of drink-driving across males/females, age groups and offenders/nonoffenders. In general drivers were found to perceive themselves as less likely than the average driver to be accident involved while impaired and non-impaired by alcohol. Drivers reporting previous drink driving behaviour indicated the greatest bias. The age and gender of the driver, independently and in interaction, were not shown to be important in the operation of these perceptual inconsistencies. Findings are discussed for implications of deterrence based drink-driving counter-measuresKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The interactionist nature of drinking and driving: a structural modelErgonomics, 1995
- Subjective probability of accident and apprehension in relation to self-other bias, age, and reported behaviorAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1993
- Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: An examination of methods and findings.Psychological Bulletin, 1993
- Comparing one's driving with others': Assessment of abilities and frequency of offences. Evidence for a superior conformity of self-bias?Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1991
- Factors underlying illusory self-assessment of driving skill in males and femalesAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1991
- Drinking and driving by young femalesAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1991
- The optimism bias and traffic accident risk perceptionAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1989
- Accountability and complexity of thought.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- Perceived Risk and Deterrence: Methodological Artifacts in Perceptual Deterrence ResearchThe Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 1982
- Unrealistic optimism about future life events.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980