How I Stopped Dreading and Learned to Love Transcription
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Qualitative Inquiry
- Vol. 11 (2), 226-248
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800404273413
Abstract
As a novice qualitative researcher, the author had little idea of the significant and vital role of transcription in the qualitative research process until she undertook her own transcription tasks. The questions she asked herself during that work led her to insights on transcription both as product and as methodological process. Her purpose in writing this article is to enter into the discussion of the nature and role of transcription in qualitative research by contributing an experiential context created when the transcription process is regarded as a key phase of data analysis within interpretive qualitative methodology. The structure of this article parallels the sequence of her learning experiences. The findings generate an enhanced view of transcription and transcriber as methodological components, provide a clearer vision for researcher positioning on the intersecting landscapes of transcription and qualitative methodology, and illuminate some implications for the training of qualitative researchers.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Challenging” Research Practices: Turning a Critical Lens on the Work of TranscriptionQualitative Inquiry, 2003
- Transcription in Research and Practice: From Standardization of Technique to Interpretive PositioningsQualitative Inquiry, 1999
- Choosing Qualitative Data Analysis Software: Atlas/ti and Nudist ComparedSociological Research Online, 1998
- The Myth of the Objective Transcript: Transcribing as a Situated ActTESOL Quarterly, 1997
- Transcribing Talk: Issues of RepresentationTESOL Quarterly, 1997
- Transcription Quality as an Aspect of Rigor in Qualitative ResearchQualitative Inquiry, 1995
- The ’practices’ of transcription in conversation analysisSemiotica, 1990