ABDOMINAL DRAINAGE: A CLINICAL REVIEW
- 1 April 1979
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 49 (2), 253-260
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1979.tb04951.x
Abstract
A review of the indications for, and technique of, abdominal drainage is presented. An analysis is made of the physical characteristics of the commonly used types of drains. Evidence is presented that abdominal drains, although sometimes life-saving, are potentially harmfully and should be used only when a clear indication is present. When drainage is employed, it should be of the most efficient, closed type, and the drain should be removed at the earliest safe time after operation.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Wound infection following appendicectomy: The effect of extraperitoneal wound drainage and systemic antibiotic prophylaxisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1977
- Changes in immune status in patients undergoing splenectomy for the staging of Hodgkin's disease.BMJ, 1976
- Aetiology and prevention of wound infection in appendicectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1974
- Are silicone rubber T-tubes better than latex rubber tubes in the common bile duct? A Rhesus monkey modelBritish Journal of Surgery, 1974
- Bowel obstruction from drainage tubesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1973
- Polyvinyl T-tubes in biliary surgery.BMJ, 1973
- Preparation of the intestine in patients undergoing major large-bowel surgery, mainly for neoplasms of the colon and rectumBritish Journal of Surgery, 1971
- Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoidBritish Journal of Surgery, 1970
- Disappearing drain.BMJ, 1968
- TISSUE REACTIONS TO POLYMERSThe Lancet, 1962