Docetaxel-induced lymphopenia in patients with solid tumors
- 15 September 2000
- Vol. 89 (6), 1380-1386
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20000915)89:6<1380::aid-cncr23>3.0.co;2-r
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quantitative abnormalities of the different peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets during docetaxel administration were prospectively studied. METHODS Forty‐six chemotherapy‐naive patients with solid tumors were treated with docetaxel either in a 3 weekly (n = 33) or weekly (n = 13) schedule. Twenty patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastatic disease as the first clinical presentation of cancer and 35 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with chemotherapy were enrolled as controls. The phenotype of peripheral blood lymphocytes was determined by indirect immunofluorescence using appropriate monoclonal antibodies and fluorescent‐activated cell sorter analysis. RESULTS After the administration of the first docetaxel cycle, the absolute number of peripheral blood lymphocytes (P < 0.005), CD3+ (P < 0.01), CD4+ (P < 0.01), CD8+ (P < 0.01), and CD56+ (P < 0.01) but not CD20+ (P < 0.3) cells was significantly decreased compared with the pretreatment values. Further treatment resulted in a further decrease of these lymphocyte subsets including CD20+ cells (P < 0.01). Similarly, after the administration of the first weekly dose of docetaxel, the absolute number of total lymphocytes, CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ cells was decreased. The administration of the second weekly docetaxel dose resulted in a further decrease of CD56+ (P = 0.012) and CD20+ (P = 0.007) cells. The administration of either high dose corticosteroids in patients with CNS metastases or an irrelevant chemotherapy (CPT‐11/5‐FU) did not result in similar abnormalities. The discontinuation of docetaxel was associated with a recovery of CD3+ and CD4+ lymphocytes within a 3‐month period. Eight (17%) patients developed nonneutropenic infections during docetaxel treatment. CONCLUSIONS Docetaxel has an important but reversible nonspecific lymphopenic effect that seems to be associated with an increased risk for nonneutropenic infections. Cancer 2000;89:1380–6. © 2000 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dose-Escalation Study of Docetaxel in Combination With Mitoxantrone as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Front-Line Treatment of Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Docetaxel and Gemcitabine: A Multicenter Phase II TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- First-line treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma with docetaxel and vinorelbineCancer, 1998
- nCombination chemotherapy with docetaxel, vinorelbine and cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicenter phase II study of the Greek Cooperative Group for Lung CancerLung Cancer, 1998
- Weekly docetaxel and concomitant boost radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. A phase I/II dose escalation trialEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1998
- First-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with docetaxel and cisplatin: A multicenter phase II studyAnnals of Oncology, 1998
- Severe lymphocytopenia and interstitial pneumonia in patients treated with paclitaxel and simultaneous radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1996
- Immunosuppressive effects and clinical response of fludarabine in refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemiaAnnals of Oncology, 1993
- Severe immunodeficiency in patients treated with fludarabine monophosphateEuropean Journal of Haematology, 1993
- On methods in the analysis of profile dataPsychometrika, 1959