Discounting Discounting
- 1 February 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Public Policy
- Vol. 2 (1), 53-71
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00001793
Abstract
Policy analysts typically presume that future payoffs should be discounted relative to present ones, and that this discounting should proceed at the same rate for all goods and all periods. Closer inspection of four arguments for discounting, however, shows these practices to be problematic. Only two of those arguments provide plausible justifications for time-discounting at all; and neither of those justify a constant rate throughout all periods or for all goods. Indeed, there is an important class of ‘nontradable’ goods which can be discounted only in their own terms. The overall conclusion is that policymakers ought, logically as well as morally, to weight the interests of the future far more heavily than in ordinary discounting procedures.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uncertain Lifetime, Consumption, and Dissaving in RetirementJournal of Political Economy, 1981
- Positive Time PreferenceJournal of Political Economy, 1981
- Two Models of Population GrowthAmerican Anthropologist, 1980
- Foundations of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health and Medical PracticesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- NOTES ON PUBLIC INVESTMENT CRITERIA IN THE UNITED KINGDOM1Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Economics & Statistics, 1965
- On Optimising the Rate of SavingThe Economic Journal, 1961
- A Note on Tinbergen on the Optimum Rate on SavingThe Economic Journal, 1957
- Investment Criteria for Economic Development and the Theory of Intertemporal Welfare EconomicsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1957
- The Optimum Rate of SavingThe Economic Journal, 1956
- Choice, Expectations and MeasurabilityThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1954