A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients
- 15 December 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 13 (23-24), 2465-2476
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780132310
Abstract
In general, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC's) are designed to assess consistency or conformity between two or more quantitative measurements. They are claimed to handle a wide range of problems, including questions of reliability, reproducibility and validity. It is shown that care must be taken in choosing a suitable ICC with respect to the underlying sampling theory. For this purpose a decision tree is developed. It may be used to choose a coefficient which is appropriate for a specific study setting. We demonstrate that different ICC's may result in quite different values for the same data set, even under the same sampling theory. Other general limitations of ICC's are also addressed. Potential alternatives are presented and discussed, and some recommendations are given for the use of an appropriate method.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A statistical assessment of clinical equivalenceStatistics in Medicine, 1988
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- A nonparametric measure of intraclass correlationBiometrika, 1979
- The Non-Null Distribution of the Spearman Rank Correlation CoefficientJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974
- Improved Approximation to the Non-Null Distribution of the Correlation CoefficientJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1973
- The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of ReliabilityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
- Bivariate Agreement Coefficients for Reliability of DataSociological Methodology, 1970
- A NEW VIEW OF INTER‐OBSERVER AGREEMENT1Personnel Psychology, 1963
- Intra-class rank correlationBiometrika, 1949