Overconfidence in Interval Estimates.
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Vol. 30 (2), 299-314
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.299
Abstract
Judges were asked to make numerical estimates (e.g., "In what year was the first flight of a hot air balloon?"). Judges provided high and low estimates such that they were X% sure that the correct answer lay between them. They exhibited substantial overconfidence: The correct answer fell inside their intervals much less than X% of the time. This contrasts with choices between 2 possible answers to a question, which showed much less overconfidence. The authors show that overconfidence in interval estimates can result from variability in setting interval widths. However, the main cause is that subjective intervals are systematically too narrow given the accuracy of one's information-sometimes only 40% as large as necessary to be well calibrated. The degree of overconfidence varies greatly depending on how intervals are elicited. There are also substantial differences among domains and between male and female judges. The authors discuss the possible psychological mechanisms underlying this pattern of findings.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- A random support model of the calibration of subjective probabilitiesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2003
- Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard–easy effect.Psychological Review, 2000
- Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You AskOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999
- The Hard–Easy Effect in Subjective Probability CalibrationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- The False Consensus Effect and Overconfidence: Flaws in Judgment or Flaws in How We Study Judgment?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Determinants of Overconfidence and Miscalibration: The Roles of Random Error and Ecological StructureOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996
- Are We Overconfident in the Belief That Probability Forecasters Are Overconfident?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994
- The Overconfidence Phenomenon as a Consequence of Informal Experimenter-Guided Selection of Almanac ItemsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994
- Overconfidence in estimation: Testing the anchoring-and-adjustment hypothesisOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991
- A note on aggregating opinionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978