Does Palliative Chemotherapy Palliate? Evaluation of Expectations, Outcomes, and Costs in Women Receiving Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 19 (5), 1266-1274
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.5.1266
Abstract
PURPOSE: The value of palliative chemotherapy in women with refractory and recurrent ovarian cancer is difficult to quantify, and little is known about patient expectations from these treatments. We evaluated in the current prospective study patient expectations, palliative outcomes of chemotherapy, and the inherent resource utilization in patients undergoing second- or third-line chemotherapy for recurrent or refractory advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O) questionnaires were used to assess palliative benefit and an in-house questionnaire was used to gauge patient expectations. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated by asking women to make a global rating of change and correlating this to the EORTC QLQ C30. Resource use was recorded and costs were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were accrued. Objective response was documented on seven of 27. The median survival was 11 months. Sixty-five percent of women expected that chemotherapy would make them live longer and 42% that it would cure them. After two cycles, quality-of-life (QL) improvement was seen particularly in global function (11 of 21) and emotional function (13 of 21) with EORTC QLQ C-30. Improvement was sustained for a median of 2 and 3 months, respectively, in these categories. The MCID was calculated to be 0.39 on a seven-point scale for physical function and 0.13 for global function. The mean total cost per patient for the study period was Can $12,500. CONCLUSION: Patient expectations from these treatments are often unrealistic. Although objective responses are low, active palliation with chemotherapy is associated with substantive improvement in patients’ emotional function and global QL, with overall costs that seem relatively modest.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaireJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Hexamethylmelamine as second-line therapy in platin-resistant ovarian cancerGynecologic Oncology, 1992
- Carboplatin and cyclophosphamide salvage therapy for ovarian cancer patients relapsing after cisplatin combination chemotherapyEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Salvage chemotherapy for ovarian cancer recurrence: Weekly cisplatin in combination with epirubicin or etoposideGynecologic Oncology, 1991
- Letters to patients: improving communication in cancer careThe Lancet, 1991
- Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public.BMJ, 1990
- Hexamethylmelamine as a single second-line agent in ovarian cancerGynecologic Oncology, 1990
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Hexamethylmelamine in ovarian cancer after failure of cisplatin-based multiple-agent chemotherapyGynecologic Oncology, 1987
- Cost Effectiveness of Clinical Diagnosis, Venography, and Noninvasive Testing in Patients with Symptomatic Deep-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981