BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women of different ethnicities undergoing testing for hereditary breast‐ovarian cancer
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 28 April 2009
- Vol. 115 (10), 2222-2233
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24200
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In women at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer, the identification of a mutation in breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1) and BRCA2 has important implications for screening and prevention counseling. Uncertainty regarding the role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in high‐risk women from diverse ancestral backgrounds exists because of variability in prevalence estimates of deleterious (disease‐associated) mutations in non‐white populations. In this study, the authors examined the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in an ethnically diverse group of women who were referred for genetic testing. METHODS: In this cross‐sectional analysis, the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations was assessed in a group of non‐Ashkenazi Jewish women who underwent genetic testing. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2006, 46,276 women who met study criteria underwent DNA full‐sequence analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Deleterious mutations were identified in 12.5% of women, and recurrent deleterious mutations (prevalence >2%) were identified in all ancestral groups. Women of non‐European descent were younger (mean age, 45.9 years; standard deviation [SD], 11.6 years) than European women (mean age, 50 years; SD, 11.9 years; P < .001). Women of African (15.6%; odds ratio [OR], 1.3 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.1‐1.5]) and Latin American (14.8%; OR, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.1‐1.4]) ancestries had a significantly higher prevalence of deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations compared with women of Western European ancestry (12.1%), primarily because of an increased prevalence of BRCA1 mutations in those 2 groups. Non‐European ethnicity was associated strongly with having a variant of uncertain significance; however, reclassification decreased variant reporting (from 12.8%→5.9%), and women of African ancestry experienced the largest decline (58%). CONCLUSIONS: Mutation prevalence was found to be high among women who were referred for clinical BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing, and the risk was similar across diverse ethnicities. BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing is integral to cancer risk assessment in all high‐risk women. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.Keywords
Funding Information
- American Cancer Society (MRSG-07-232-01-CPHPS)
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recent breast cancer trends among Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and African-American women in the US: changes by tumor subtypeBreast Cancer Research, 2007
- Triple negative tumours: a critical reviewHistopathology, 2007
- Cancer Statistics, 2007CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2007
- Evaluation of models to predict BRCA germline mutationsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2006
- Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in the United States, 1999-2004JAMA, 2006
- Single nucleotide polymorphisms in clinical genetic testing: the characterization of the clinical significance of genetic variants and their application in clinical research for BRCA1Mutation Research, 2005
- Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Reduces Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: The PROSE Study GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risks Due to Inherited Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2Science, 2003
- The Risk of Cancer Associated with Specific Mutations ofBRCA1andBRCA2among Ashkenazi JewsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2Nature, 1995