Comparison of induction characteristics of four intravenous anaesthetic agents
- 1 October 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 41 (10), 995-1000
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb12740.x
Abstract
The induction characteristics of thiopentone, etomidate and methohexitone have been compared to those of propofol (2,6 di-isopropyl phenol) in unpremedicated patients. Propofol 2.5 mg/kg caused significantly more hypotension, excitatory side effects and pain on injection at the dorsum of hand than thiopentone 5 mg/kg. However, with regard to the latter two sequelae, etomidate 0.3 mg/kg and methohexitone 1.5 mg/kg caused similar or more frequent upset. Propofol 2.0 mg/kg was equipotent with thiopentone 4.0 mg/kg in terms of successful induction of anaesthesia. Hypotension may contraindicate the use of propofol in the hypovolaemic or unfit patient.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sensitivity to propofol in the elderlyAnaesthesia, 1986
- A comparison of the induction characteristics of thiopentone and propofol (2, 6‐di‐isopropyl phenol)Anaesthesia, 1985
- USE OF AN EMULSION OF ICI 35868 (PROPOFOL) FOR THE INDUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANAESTHESIABritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985
- COMPARISION OF ICI 35868, ETOMIDATE AND METHOHEXITONE FOR DAY-CASE ANAESTHESIABritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985
- COMPARISION OF THE NEW EMULSION FORMULATION OF PROPOFOL WITH METHOHEXITONE AND THIOPENTONE FOR INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA IN DAY CASESBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985
- EFFECT OF INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA WITH ETOMIDATE ON CORTICOSTEROID SYNTHESIS IN MANBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1985
- Dose requirements of ICI 35,868 (Propofol, ‘Diprivan’) in a new formulation for induction of anaesthesiaAnaesthesia, 1984
- EVALUATION OF THREE PREPARATIONS OF ETOMIDATEBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1978
- CLINICAL STUDIES OF INDUCTION AGENTSBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1963
- SOME FACTORS INFLUENCING THE INDUCTION CHARACTERISTICS OF METHOHEXITONE ANAESTHESIABritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1961