Bone tumors: magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography.

Abstract

The magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characteristics of bone tumors are described and the clinical utility of MR imaging in patient evaluation is reported. Fifty-two patients with skeletal lesions were examined with a Picker MR imager (0.15-T resistive magnet). Twenty-five patients had primary malignancies, 7 had benign bone neoplasms, 15 had skeletal metastases and 5 had neoplasm simulators. Forty-five patients had CT [computed tomography] scans available for comparison. For demonstrating the extent of tumor in marrow, MR was superior to CT in 33% of cases, about equal to CT in 64% and inferior to CT in 2%. For delineating the extent of tumor in soft tissue, MR was superior to CT in 38% of cases and about equal to CT in 62%. CT was superior in all cases for demonstrating calcific deposits and pathologic fractures. In 4 patients with metal prostheses or surgical clips, MR was superior to CT in documenting recurrent tumor because of artifactual degradation of the CT image. Direct sagittal and coronal images for MR permit accurate assessment of the relationship of tumor to adjacent normal structures, including the physis, joints and neurovascular structures. MR is useful in the evaluation of bone tumors; it is of greatest value in evaluations of the peripheral skeleton, the medullary canal, soft tissues and postoperative tumor recurrence. With a 0.15-T magnet, MR is less useful in the evaluation of the axial skeleton and cortical bone.