Abstract
In most calculations of annual fluences of carcinogenic light as well as of the radiation amplification factor and of biological amplification factors associated with ozone depletions, the radiation is assumed to fall on a horizontally oriented plane surface. This is obviously a bad approximation of the surface of the human body. In order to evaluate the importance of using a realistic geometric representation of the surface of the human body we here present calculations of the flux of carcinogenically effective radiation falling on three different bodies: a ventrically standing cyclinder, a sphewre and a horizontally oriented surface. The exposure to carcinogenic radiation depends strongly on the surface geometry. However we find that the radiation amplification factors are almost independnent of the surface geometry chosen. The biological amplificiation factors for the three geometrical representations are also similar to within 20%. The total amplification factor for the increase in the incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer related to ozone depletion is about 17% larger when a cylindrical representation is used compared to when a plane horizontal surface is considered.