Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry normal reference range use within the UK and the effect of different normal ranges on the assessment of bone density
- 1 August 1995
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 68 (812), 903-909
- https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-68-812-903
Abstract
The number of different normal ranges used on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) machines in the United Kingdom was determined by means of a postal questionnaire. Both femoral neck and posteroanterior spine L2-L4 regions were considered. It was clear from this survey that a variety of normal ranges were in use for all manufacturers of DEXA systems. The effects of four normal ranges supplied by Norland for use within the UK on the stratification of over 1000 consecutive patients into different grades of bone mineral density (BMD) and Z-score were examined. The main outcomes measure the number of patients with BMD less than 80% of mean age-matched BMD and Z-score less than -1.5 over the femoral neck and spine for each normal range. The percentage of patients for each normal range with BMD less than 80% of mean for the femoral neck were 24.6%, 7.4%, 17.5% and 11.1% and for the spine 12.1%, 7.4%, 16.5% and 14.4%, respectively. For the femoral neck, 21.2%, 5.0%, 12.9% and 12.1% of patients had Z-scores of less than -1.5, for the spine this was 7.9%, 8.1%, 14.2% and 13.6% of patients. These differences between ranges are large enough to influence patient management--patients may be diagnosed as osteoporotic using one range and normal using another. The relationship between hip and spine measurements was also studied as some therapeutic agents do not affect BMD equally at all anatomical sites. The number of patients with a lower hip than spine BMD grade varied from 12.3% to 34.4%, and with a lower hip than spine Z-score from 14.0% to 43.4%. Choice of normal range thus has a critical effect on the categorization of osteoporotic patients using DEXA. The wide variety of normal ranges indicates that there are likely to be differences in patient management throughout the country. This will be an increasing problem due to the ability of NHS purchasers to switch contracts from one provider to another.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of reference bone mineral density measurements derived from two sources: referred and population basedThe British Journal of Radiology, 1993
- Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fracturesThe Lancet, 1993
- Comparison of the effect of different reference data on Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometersThe British Journal of Radiology, 1992
- Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by Dual X-Ray absorptiometry: Comparison of lunar and hologic instrumentsJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1992
- Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray absorptiometersThe British Journal of Radiology, 1991
- OESTROGEN, THE PREVENTION OF BONE LOSS AND OSTEOPOROSISRheumatology, 1991
- Interpretation of bone densitometry measurements: Disadvantages of a percentage scale and a discussion of some alternativesJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1990
- Calibration and standardization of bone mineral densitometersJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1989
- Effect of salcatonin given intranasally on early postmenopausal bone loss.BMJ, 1989
- X-ray dual-photon absorptiometry: a new method for the measurement of bone densityThe British Journal of Radiology, 1989