Extended Transthoracic Resection Compared with Limited Transhiatal Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 21 November 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 347 (21), 1662-1669
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa022343
Abstract
Controversy exists about the best surgical treatment for esophageal carcinoma. We randomly assigned 220 patients with adenocarcinoma of the mid-to-distal esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia involving the distal esophagus either to transhiatal esophagectomy or to transthoracic esophagectomy with extended en bloc lymphadenectomy. Principal end points were overall survival and disease-free survival. Early morbidity and mortality, the number of quality-adjusted life-years gained, and cost effectiveness were also determined. A total of 106 patients were assigned to undergo transhiatal esophagectomy, and 114 to undergo transthoracic esophagectomy. Demographic characteristics and characteristics of the tumor were similar in the two groups. Perioperative morbidity was higher after transthoracic esophagectomy, but there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (P=0.45). After a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 142 patients had died — 74 (70 percent) after transhiatal resection and 68 (60 percent) after transthoracic resection (P=0.12). Although the difference in survival was not statistically significant, there was a trend toward a survival benefit with the extended approach at five years: disease-free survival was 27 percent in the transhiatal-esophagectomy group, as compared with 39 percent in the transthoracic-esophagectomy group (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, –1 to 24 percent [the negative value indicates better survival with transhiatal resection]), whereas overall survival was 29 percent as compared with 39 percent (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, –3 to 23 percent). Transhiatal esophagectomy was associated with lower morbidity than transthoracic esophagectomy with extended en bloc lymphadenectomy. Although median overall, disease-free, and quality-adjusted survival did not differ statistically between the groups, there was a trend toward improved long-term survival at five years with the extended transthoracic approach.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Prospective analysis of the diagnostic yield of extended en bloc resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastric cardiaBritish Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Laparoscopy and Laparoscopic Ultrasonography in Staging Carcinoma of the Gastric CardiaThe European Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Unstable Preferences:Medical Decision Making, 2000
- Adenocarcinomas of the distal oesophagus and gastric cardia are one clinical entityBritish Journal of Surgery, 1999
- A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinomaThe American Journal of Surgery, 1997
- Surgical therapy of esophageal carcinoma: the influence of surgical approach and esophageal resection on cardiopulmonary functionEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- Tumors of the esophagogastric junction: long-term survival in relation to the pattern of lymph node metastasis and a critical analysis of the accuracy or inaccuracy of ptnm classificationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1996
- Surgical/pathologic-stage migration confounds comparisons of gastric cancer survival rates between Japan and Western countries.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1995
- Oesophagectomy by a transhiatal approach or thoracotomy: A prospective randomized trialBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993