Space and frequency are represented separately in auditory midbrain of the owl
- 1 July 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 41 (4), 870-884
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1978.41.4.870
Abstract
1. The influence of sound location and sound frequency on the responses of single units in the midbrain auditory area (MLD) of the owl (Tyto alba) were studied using a movable sound source under free-field conditions. With this technique, two functionally distinct regions in MLD have been identified: a tonotopic region and a space-mapped region. 2. MLD units were classified according to their receptive-field properties: 1) limited-field units responded only to sound from a small, discrete area of space; 2) complex-field units exhibited two to four different excitatory areas separated by areas of reduced response or inhibition: 3) space-preferring units responded best to a certain area of space, but their fields expanded considerably with increasing sound intensities; 4) Space-independent units responded similarly to a sound stimulus regardless of its location in space. 3. Limited-field units were located exclusively along the lateral and anterior borders of MLD. These units were tuned to sound frequencies at the high end of the owl's audible range (5-8.7 kHz). They usually responded only at the onset of a tonal stimulus; but most importantly, the units were systematically arranged in this region according to the azimuths and elevations of their receptive fields, thus creating a physiological map of auditory space. Because of this latter, dominant aspect of its functional organization, this region is named the space-mapped region of MLD. 4. The receptive fields of units in the larger, medial portion of MLD were of the space-independent, space-preferring, or complex-field types. These units tended to respond in a sustained fashion to tone and noise bursts, and these units were arranged in a strict frequency-dependent order. Based on this last property, this region is named the tonotopic region of MLD. 5. Because of the salient differences in the response properties of their constituent units, it is argued that the space-mapped region and the tonotopic region are involved in different aspects of sound analysis.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Receptive Fields of Auditory Neurons in the OwlScience, 1977
- Coding of narrow-band and wide-band vocalizations in the auditory midbrain nucleus (MLD) of the Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris)Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 1977
- Disproportionate Tonotopic Representation for Processing CF-FM Sonar Signals in the Mustache Bat Auditory CortexScience, 1976
- Responses of auditory neurons in the forebrain of a songbird to stimulation with species-specific soundsJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1976
- SOME DISCHARGE CHARACTERISTICS OF SINGLE NEURONS IN THE INFERIOR COLLICULUS OF THE CAT. I. TONOTOPICAL ORGANIZATION, RELATION OF SPIKE-COUNTS TO TONE INTENSITY, AND FIRING PATTERNS OF SINGLE ELEMENTSJournal of Neurophysiology, 1963