Water Resources in Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment: Considerations in Choosing Category Indicators
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Vol. 5 (2), 37-54
- https://doi.org/10.1162/10881980152830123
Abstract
Water is one of many resources, wastes, and pollutants considered in life-cycle assessment (LCA). The widely used indicator for water resources, the total input of water used, is not adequate to assess water resources from a sustainability perspective. More detailed indicators are proposed for water resources in two areas essential to water sustainability: water quantity and water quality. The governing principles for a consideration of water quantity are that (1) the water sources or LCA inputs are renewable and sustainable and (2) the volume of water released or LCA outputs are returned to humans or ecosystems for further use downstream. The governing principle for a consideration of water quality is that the utility of the returned water is not impaired for either humans or ecosystems downstream. Water quantity indicators are defined for water use, consumption, and depletion to reveal the sustainable or nonsustainable nature of the sources. A flexible set of water quality indicators for various factors that may impair water quality are then discussed, including the LCA study choices, technical challenges, and trade-offs involved with such indicators. Indicator selection from this set involves the underlying concern or endpoint represented by the indicator and the level and accuracy of decision-making information that the indicator must provide. With significant differences in emissions among systems studied using LCA and different purposes of the LCA studies themselves, a single, default set of water quality indicators applicable to all systems studied with LCA is problematic. The proposed water quantity and quality indicators for LCA studies are also intended to be compatible with environmental management and reporting systems so that data needs are not duplicated and interpretation for one does not contradict or sow confusion for the other.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bottom‐up and top‐down approaches to assess multiple stressors over large geographic areasEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2000
- BOTTOM-UP AND TOP-DOWN APPROACHES TO ASSESS MULTIPLE STRESSORS OVER LARGE GEOGRAPHIC AREASEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2000
- Whole effluent toxicity testing—usefulness, level of protection, and risk assessmentEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2000
- Priority setting for existing chemicals: European Union risk ranking methodEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1999
- PRIORITY SETTING FOR EXISTING CHEMICALS: EUROPEAN UNION RISK RANKING METHODEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1999
- A SCREENING METHOD FOR RANKING AND SCORING CHEMICALS BY POTENTIAL HUMAN HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTSEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1997
- Life‐Cycle Assessment: Constraints on Moving from Inventory to Impact AssessmentJournal of Industrial Ecology, 1997
- Environmental management in an international consumer goods companyResources, Conservation and Recycling, 1995
- Resource and environmental profile analysis of children's diaper systemsEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1994
- RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN'S DIAPER SYSTEMSEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1994