When Group Members Admit to Being Conformist: The Role of Relative Intragroup Status in Conformity Self-Reports
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 32 (2), 162-173
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205279904
Abstract
Five studies examined the hypothesis that people will strategically portray the self as being more group influenced the more junior they feel within the group. Among social psychologists (Study 1), ratings of self-conformity by group members were greater when the status of the participant was low than when it was high. These effects were replicated in Studies 2, 3, and 4 in which relative intragroup status was manipulated. In Study 3, the authors found junior group members described themselves as more conformist than senior members when they were addressing an ingroup audience, but when they were addressing an outgroup audience the effect disappeared. Furthermore, junior members (but not senior members) rated themselves as more conformist when they were led to believe their responses were public than when responses were private (Study 5). The discussion focuses on the strategic processes underlying low-status group members’ self-reports of group influence and the functional role of conformity in groups.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Who wants to know? The effect of audience on identity expression among minority group membersBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 2003
- Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002
- You Can’t Always Do What You Want: Social Identity and Self-Presentational Determinants of the Choice to Work for a Low-Status GroupPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000
- Self-enhancement and Superiority Biases in Social ComparisonEuropean Review of Social Psychology, 1993
- Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self‐categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization*British Journal of Social Psychology, 1990
- A puzzling misinterpretation of the Asch ‘conformity’ studyEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1990
- A self-presentational view of social phenomena.Psychological Bulletin, 1982
- Attributional bias and the easily persuaded other.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974
- Studies in Leader Legitimacy, Influence, and InnovationPublished by Elsevier ,1970
- Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit.Psychological Review, 1958