Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences
- 4 February 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 263 (5147), 641-646
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.263.5147.641
Abstract
Verification and validation of numerical models of natural systems is impossible. This is because natural systems are never closed and because model results are always nonunique. Models can be confirmed by the demonstration of agreement between observation and prediction, but confirmation is inherently partial. Complete confirmation is logically precluded by the fallacy of affirming the consequent and by incomplete access to natural phenomena. Models can only be evaluated in relative terms, and their predictive value is always open to question. The primary value of models is heuristic.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Manufacturing Certainty: Testing and Program* Management for the F-4 Phantom IISocial Studies of Science, 1993
- The Modeling Process and Model ValidationGroundwater, 1991
- The Yucca Mountain project: Another perspectiveEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1990
- The Yucca Mountain project: Storage problems of high-level radioactive wastesEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1989
- Program verification: the very ideaCommunications of the ACM, 1988
- History, Philosophy, and the Central MetaphorScience in Context, 1988
- Predictive Accuracy of a Ground–Water Model — Lessons from a PostauditGroundwater, 1986
- Assessment of Long‐Term Salinity Changes in an Irrigated Stream‐Aquifer SystemWater Resources Research, 1985
- BOOK AND FILM REVIEWS: Revolutionary View of the History of Science: The Structure of Scientific RevolutionsThe Physics Teacher, 1970
- Studies in the Logic of ExplanationPhilosophy of Science, 1948