POSTOPERATIVE SURVEILLANCE PROTOCOL FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED AND LOCALLY ADVANCED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA BASED ON A VALIDATED PROGNOSTIC NOMOGRAM AND RISK GROUP STRATIFICATION SYSTEM
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 174 (2), 466-472
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000165572.38887.da
Abstract
We created an evidence based postoperative surveillance protocol for patients with localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) based on a risk group stratification system. 559 patients undergoing surgery for localized and ocally advanced RCC were stratified into low risk (LR), intermediate risk (IR) and high risk (HR) groups based on the University of California-Los Angeles Integrated Staging System (UISS). Tumor recurrences were identified and categorized according to time and location. Patients with localized disease had a lower 5-year recurrence rate than patients with locally advanced (nodal) disease (27.6% vs 64%, p <0.0001). Patients in the LR, IR, and HR groups following nephrectomy demonstrated 5-year recurrence-free rates of 90.4%, 61.8%, and 41.9%, respectively (p <0.0001), and median times to recurrence of 28.9, 17.8 and 9.5 months, respectively (p <0.0001). Chest and abdomen recurrences comprised of 75% and 37.5%, 77.4% and 58.1%, and 45.2% and 67.7% of recurrences in the LR, IR and HR groups, respectively. In patients with node positive disease, chest and abdomen comprised of 58.8% and 76.5% of recurrences, respectively. Patients undergoing partial nephrectomy did not demonstrate a greater rate of local or distant recurrence compared with patients undergoing radical nephrectomy. Significant differences in incidence and time to recurrence following surgical resection for RCC mandates unique surveillance protocols for patients in each of the UISS risk groups. LR group patients should be followed for at least 5 years, whereas IR and HR group patients require longer surveillance. HR group patients require more stringent abdominal surveillance, whereas LR group patients should emphasize the chest. Patients with nodal disease also require stringent followup. Patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for localized disease can be followed according to the same UISS risk group based protocol.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- RENAL CELL CARCINOMA 2005: NEW FRONTIERS IN STAGING, PROGNOSTICATION AND TARGETED MOLECULAR THERAPYJournal of Urology, 2005
- Use of the University of California Los Angeles Integrated Staging System to Predict Survival in Renal Cell Carcinoma: An International Multicenter StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Surveillance after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma and management of recurrent diseaseUrologic Clinics of North America, 2003
- Risk Group Assessment and Clinical Outcome Algorithm to Predict the Natural History of Patients With Surgically Resected Renal Cell CarcinomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- An Outcome Prediction Model for Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Radical Nephrectomy Based on Tumor Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis: The Ssign ScoreJournal of Urology, 2002
- A POSTOPERATIVE PROGNOSTIC NOMOGRAM FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMAJournal of Urology, 2001
- Improved Prognostication of Renal Cell Carcinoma Using an Integrated Staging SystemJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- TNM staging of renal cell carcinomaCancer, 1997
- A New Protocol for the Followup of Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on Pathological StageJournal of Urology, 1995
- Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1982