Effect of pretreatment on surface water nanofiltration
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal AWWA
- Vol. 89 (10), 77-89
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1997.tb08307.x
Abstract
A pilot study using integrated membrane systems suggests that MF or UF pretreatment may be necessary to reduce fouling during NF of surface water.An integrated membrane system pilot study compared microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), and conventional treatment as pretreatment strategies for surface water nanofiltration (NF) using spiral‐wound elements. MF and UF pretreatment resulted in lower NF fouling rates and longer cleaning intervals compared with those measured following conventional treatment. NF fouling rates evaluated under a wide range of hydrodynamic conditions following conventional treatment suggest NF fouling is more influenced by permeate flux than by feedwater recovery. NF was shown to be capable of meeting all current and anticipated trihalomethane and haloacetic acid regulations.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of NOM composition on nanofiltrationJournal AWWA, 1996
- Evaluating NF for DBP control with the RBSMTJournal AWWA, 1995
- Selecting membranes for removing NOM and DBP precursorsJournal AWWA, 1994
- DBP Control by Nanofiltration: Cost and PerformanceJournal AWWA, 1992
- Slip at a uniformly porous boundary: effect on fluid flow and mass transferJournal of Engineering Mathematics, 1992
- Comparing Ozonation and Membrane Separation for Color Removal and Disinfection By‐product ControlJournal AWWA, 1991
- Cost and Performance of a Membrane Pilot PlantJournal AWWA, 1989
- Membrane modules: comparison of different configurations using fluid mechanicsJournal of Membrane Science, 1988
- Applying Membrane Processes to Groundwater Sources for Trihalomethane Precursor ControlJournal AWWA, 1987
- Fluid flow in an idealized spiral wound membrane moduleJournal of Membrane Science, 1986