Do Upper Ureteral Stones Need to be Manipulated (Push Back) into the Kidneys Before Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy?
- 1 February 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 147 (2), 349-351
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37234-8
Abstract
The current practice for the management of upper ureteral stones is to push the stone back into the renal pelvis before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL*). The results in 903 patients with an upper third ureteral stone pushed back before ESWL were compared to those of 815 with an upper third ureteral stone treated by ESWL in situ with a ureteral stent bypassing the stone. The stone size in the in situ group was larger than in the push back group. More shocks at a higher kilovoltage were required to treat the in situ group. The retreatment rate and post-ESWL secondary procedure rate for the push back group with single stones were 4% and 1.5%, respectively, compared to 5% and 7.5%, respectively, for the in situ group. The stone-free rate with single stones at 3 months was 73% in the push back group and 79% in the in situ group. There appears to be little advantage in manipulating a ureteral stone into the kidney (push back) before treatment by ESWL.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment Options for Proximal Ureteral Urolithiasis: Review and RecommendationsJournal of Urology, 1989
- Effectiveness of radiation control program for dornier hm3 lithotriptorUrology, 1989
- Treatment of Ureteral Calculi by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy at a Multi-use CenterJournal of Urology, 1988
- Management of Upper Ureteral Calculi with Extracorporeal Shock wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1987
- An Algorithm for the Management of Ureteral CalculiJournal of Urology, 1986
- Ureteral Stone Management: Emerging ConceptsJournal of Urology, 1986