Does reporting of coronary artery bypass grafting from administrative databases accurately reflect actual clinical outcomes?
- 30 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 129 (6), 1309-1317
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.10.036
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate?The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2004
- Validity of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery DatabaseThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2004
- Evaluation of a Consumer-Oriented Internet Health Care Report CardJAMA, 2002
- Cardiac surgery report cards: comprehensive review and statistical critiqueThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- The STS National Database: current changes and challenges for the new millenniumThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2000
- The Need for Accurate Risk-Adjusted Measures of Outcome in SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- Clinical Versus Administrative Data Bases for CABG SurgeryMedical Care, 1992
- The accuracy of Medicare's hospital claims data: progress has been made, but problems remain.American Journal of Public Health, 1992
- A Regional Prospective Study of In-Hospital Mortality Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- The STS National Database: Alive, well, and growingThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1991