Abstract
Plasmapheresis in the treatment of myasthenia gravis has led to disparate results when applied by different investigators because of considerable differences in the volume, number, and tempo of plasmaphereses and in the type and amount of concomitant immunosuppressive drug therapy. Used as short‐term crisis intervention, plasmapheresis produces temporary clinical improvement and reduction in titer of antibody to acetylcholine receptor, even without accompanying drug therapy. When applied as long‐term primary therapy under optimal conditions, plasmapheresis is capable of generating stable improvement in most patients. This response appears to result from a synergistic action with immunosuppressive drugs, since it is characterized by a sustained reduction in titer of antibody to acetylcholine receptor. Where clinical circumstances warrant cytotoxic immunosuppression in patients with myasthenia gravis, consideration should be given to the simultaneous employment of plasmapheresis, in order to maximize benefit to the patient from a given exposure to drug therapy.