The computation of MR image distortions caused by tissue susceptibility using the boundary element method
- 1 October 1996
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Vol. 15 (5), 620-627
- https://doi.org/10.1109/42.538939
Abstract
Static field inhomogeneity in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging produces geometrical distortions which restrict the clinical applicability of MR images, e.g., for planning of precision radiotherapy. The authors describe a method to compute distortions which are caused by the difference in magnetic susceptibility between the scanned object and the surrounding air. Such a method is useful for understanding how the distortions depend on the object geometry, and for correcting for geometrical distortions, and thereby improving MR/CT registration algorithms. The geometric distortions in MR can be directly computed from the magnetic field inhomogeneity and the applied gradients. The boundary value problem of computing the magnetic field inhomogeneity caused by susceptibility differences is analyzed. It is shown that the boundary element method (BEM) has several advantages over previously applied methods to compute the magnetic field. Starting from the BEM and the assumption that the susceptibilities are very small (typically O(10(-5)) or less), a formula is derived to compute the magnetic field directly, without the need to solve a large system of equations. The method is computationally very efficient when the magnetic field is needed at a limited number of points, e.g., to compute geometrical distortions of a set of markers or a single surface. In addition to its computational advantage the method proves to be efficient to correct for the lack of data outside the scan which normally causes large artifacts in the computed magnetic field. These artifacts can be reduced by assuming that at the scan boundary the object extends to infinity in the form of a generalized cylinder. With the adaptation of the BEM this assumption is equivalent to simply omitting the scan boundary from the computations. To the authors' knowledge, no such simple correction method exists for other computation methods. The accuracy of the algorithm was tested by comparing the BEM solution with the analytical solution for a sphere. When the applied homogeneous field is 1.5 T the agreement between both methods was within 0.11.10(-6) T. As an example, the method was applied to compute the displacement vector field of the surface of a human head, derived from an MR imaging data set. This example demonstrates that the distortions can be as large as 3 mm for points just outside the head when a gradient strength of 3 mT/m is used. It was also observed that distortion within the head can be described accurately as a linear scaling in the axial direction.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Automatic detection of brain contours in MRI data setsIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1993
- Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 2DMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1992
- Surfaces from contoursACM Transactions on Graphics, 1992
- A technique for accurate magnetic resonance imaging in the presence of field inhomogeneitiesIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1992
- A linear discretization of the volume conductor boundary integral equation using analytically integrated elements (electrophysiology application)IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1992
- Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in nmr studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagentsMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1990
- Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic dataIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1989
- Shape reconstruction from planar cross sectionsComputer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 1988
- Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1985
- Interpolation of data on the surface of a sphereACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 1984