Dietary Counseling Improves Patient Outcomes: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial in Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 23 (7), 1431-1438
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.02.054
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the impact of dietary counseling or nutritional supplements on outcomes in cancer patients: nutritional, morbidity, and quality of life (QoL) during and 3 months after radiotherapy. Patients and Methods A total of 111 colorectal cancer outpatients referred for radiotherapy, stratified by staging, were randomly assigned: group 1 (G1; n = 37), dietary counseling (regular foods); group 2 (G2; n = 37), protein supplements; and group 3 (G3; n = 37), ad libitum intake. Nutritional intake (diet history), status (Ottery's Subjective Global Assessment), and QoL (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire version 3.0) were evaluated at baseline, at the end, and 3 months after radiotherapy. Results At radiotherapy completion, energy intake increased in G1/G2 (P ≤ .04), G1 more than G2 (P = .001), and decreased in G3 (P < .01). Protein intake increased in G1/G2 (P ≤ .007), G1 less than G2 (not significant), and decreased in G3 (P < .01). At 3 months, G1 maintained nutritional intake and G2/G3 returned to baseline. After radiotherapy and at 3 months, rates of anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were higher in G3 (P < .05). At radiotherapy completion, in G1 all QoL function scores improved proportionally to adequate intake or nutritional status (P < .05); whereas in G2 only three of six function scores improved proportionally to protein intake (P = .04), and in G3 all scores worsened (P < .05). At 3 months, G1 patients maintained/improved function, symptoms, and single-item scores (P < .02); in G2, only few function and symptom scales improved (P < .05); in G3, QoL remained as poor as after radiotherapy. In G1/G2, respectively, improvement/deterioration of QoL correlated with better or poorer intake or nutritional status (P < .003). Conclusion During radiotherapy, both interventions positively influenced outcomes; dietary counseling was of similar or higher benefit, whereas even 3 months after RT, it was the only method to sustain a significant impact on patient outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does nutrition influence quality of life in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy?Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2003
- The impact of malnutrition on the quality of life in the elderlyClinical Nutrition, 1999
- Should We Still Use the Harris and Benedict Equations?Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 1996
- Assessment of Quality-of-Life OutcomesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Definition of standardized nutritional assessment and interventional pathways in oncologyNutrition, 1996
- Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivorsQuality of Life Research, 1995
- Quality of life: The patient's endpointInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- The late effects of toxicity scoringInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1988
- Diets of a Group of Aircraft Workers in Southern CaliforniaThe Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1942