The Role of Financial Factors in Acceptance of Clinical BRCA Genetic Testing
- 1 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Genetic Testing
- Vol. 11 (1), 101-110
- https://doi.org/10.1089/gte.2006.9999
Abstract
Many women who are offered BRCA genetic testing by genetics professionals do not have the test, possibly for financial reasons. We explored financial factors implicated in non-uptake of BRCA testing in women who had received genetic counseling in a clinical setting. Specifically, we described financial factors (affordability, health insurance, other) involved with BRCA testing; compared nonfinancial factors (disease, sociodemographic, risk assessment) in women who did not have BRCA testing (nontesters) with women who had the test (testers); showed associations of financial and nonfinancial factors with BRCA testing; and identified predictors of non-uptake of BRCA testing. The sample of 100 women (64 nontesters and 36 testers) completed an anonymous mailed survey on financial factors; 52 of the nontesters answered questions about nonfinancial factors. Testers had significantly better affordability and insurance coverage (p < 0.001), more diagnoses of breast or ovarian cancer (p < 0.05) and higher rates of receiving post-counseling risk estimates (p < 0.05), than nontesters. Non-uptake was 5.5-fold more likely in women that could not afford full or partial payment for the test and was 15.5-fold more likely in women that did not recall receiving risk estimates post-counseling. For many women having risk factors for breast/ovarian cancer, affordability of BRCA testing and insurance coverage for the test remain problematic. Post-counseling reminders of risk estimates may contribute to uptake of testing.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Racial Differences in the Use of BRCA1/2 Testing Among Women With a Family History of Breast or Ovarian CancerJAMA, 2005
- Genetic counseling program in familial breast cancer: Analysis of its effectiveness, cost and cost‐effectiveness ratioInternational Journal of Cancer, 2004
- BRCA1/2 predictive testing: a study of uptake in two centresEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2004
- American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic Testing for Cancer SusceptibilityJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Health economics and genetic service development: a familial cancer genetic exampleFamilial Cancer, 2002
- Psychological and social determinants of women's decisions to undergo genetic counseling and testing for breast cancerClinical Genetics, 1999
- Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies ConsortiumPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, Adopted on February 20, 1996.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1996
- Women's receptivity to testing for a genetic susceptibility to breast cancer.American Journal of Public Health, 1995
- Does anonymity increase response rate in postal questionnaire surveys about sensitive subjects? A randomised trial.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1990