Tamoxifen and Chemotherapy for Axillary Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor–Negative Breast Cancer: Findings From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-23
- 15 February 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 19 (4), 931-942
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.4.931
Abstract
PURPOSE: Uncertainty about the relative worth of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) and cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil (CMF), as well as doubt about the propriety of giving tamoxifen (TAM) with chemotherapy to patients with estrogen receptor–negative tumors and negative axillary nodes, prompted the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project to initiate the B-23 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 2,008) were randomly assigned to CMF plus placebo, CMF plus TAM, AC plus placebo, or AC plus TAM. Six cycles of CMF were given for 6 months; four cycles of AC were administered for 63 days. TAM was given daily for 5 years. Relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival (EFS), and survival (S) were determined by using life-table estimates. Tests for heterogeneity of outcome used log-rank statistics and Cox proportional hazards models to detect differences across all groups and according to chemotherapy and hormonal therapy status. RESULTS: No significant difference in RFS, EFS, or S was observed among the four groups through 5 years (P = .96, .8, and .8, respectively), for those aged ≤ 49 years (P = .97, .5, and .9, respectively), or for those aged ≥ 50 years (P = .7, .6, and .6, respectively). A comparison between all CMF- and all AC-treated patients demonstrated no significant differences in RFS (87% at 5 years in both groups, P = .9), EFS (83% and 82%, P = .6), or S (89% and 90%, P = .4). There were no significant differences in RFS, EFS, or S between CMF and AC in patients aged ≤ 49 or ≥ 50 years. No significant difference in any outcome was observed when chemotherapy-treated patients who received placebo were compared with those given TAM. RFS in both groups was 87% (P = .6), 87% in patients aged ≤ 49 (P = .9), and 88% and 87%, respectively (P = .4), in those aged ≥ 50 years. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the outcome of patients who received AC or CMF. TAM with either regimen resulted in no significant advantage over that achieved from chemotherapy alone.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prolonged Disease-Free Survival after One Course of Perioperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Negative Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Node-Negative Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Tamoxifen in the Treatment of Patients with Node-Negative Breast Cancer Who Have Estrogen-Receptor–Positive TumorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Sequential Methotrexate and Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Patients with Node-Negative Breast Cancer Who Have Estrogen-Receptor-Negative TumorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Tamoxifen is a calmodulin antagonist in the activation of cAMP phosphodiesteraseBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1984
- IMPROVED SURVIVAL AMONGST PATIENTS TREATED WITH ADJUVANT TAMOXIFEN AFTER MASTECTOMY FOR EARLY BREAST CANCERThe Lancet, 1983
- Tamoxifen induces accumulation of MCF 7 human mammary carcinoma cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycleEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1983
- CONTROLLED TRIAL OF TAMOXIFEN AS ADJUVANT AGENT IN MANAGEMENT OF EARLY BREAST CANCERThe Lancet, 1983
- Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer with Chemotherapy and TamoxifenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survivalJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1958