Notes on the statistics of growth standards
- 1 January 1974
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Annals of Human Biology
- Vol. 1 (1), 41-46
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03014467400000041
Abstract
The problems of constructing population standards for measurements such as height and age points such as menarche are discussed. Extreme centiles, such as the 3rd, estimated from a Gaussian distribution have a considerable imprecision, the amount of which is detailed. Non-parametric estimation, as usually used for weight, is compared with transformation to Gaussianity and thence parametric estimation. Regression standards are discussed, whereby the subject is compared with a relevant subsection of the population rather than all of it, and it is suggested that velocity of growth standards might be couched in these terms.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- WITHIN-FAMILY STANDARDS FOR BIRTH-WEIGHTThe Lancet, 1972
- WITHIN-FAMILY BIRTH-WEIGHT STANDARDSThe Lancet, 1972
- WITHIN-FAMILY STANDARDS FOR BIRTH-WEIGHTThe Lancet, 1972
- STATISTICAL METHODS OF ESTIMATING PERCENTILESAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1969
- Normal Values from a Statistical ViewpointAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 1969
- Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965. I.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1966
- The effect of age‐grouping on the distribution of a measurement affected by growthAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1962
- The Assessment of Growth and Development in ChildrenArchives of Disease in Childhood, 1952
- SYSTEMS OF FREQUENCY CURVES GENERATED BY METHODS OF TRANSLATIONBiometrika, 1949
- TESTING FOR NORMALITYBiometrika, 1947