Geometric means provide a biased efficacy result when conducting a faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT)
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Veterinary Parasitology
- Vol. 161 (1-2), 162-167
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.12.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- How repeatable is a faecal egg count reduction test?New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 2006
- Effects of aggregation and sample size on composite faecal egg counts in sheepVeterinary Parasitology, 2005
- Multiple anthelmintic resistance in Haemonchus contortus isolated from South African Boer goats in SwitzerlandVeterinary Parasitology, 2005
- Detection of anthelmintic resistance: a comparison of mathematical techniquesVeterinary Parasitology, 2005
- International harmonisation of Anthelmintic Efficacy GuidelinesVeterinary Parasitology, 2001
- Comparison of arithmetic and geometric means as measures of a central tendency in cattle nematode populationsVeterinary Parasitology, 1999
- World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importanceVeterinary Parasitology, 1992
- The role of arithmetic and geometric mean worm egg counts in faecal egg count reduction tests and in monitoring strategic drenching programs in sheepAustralian Veterinary Journal, 1988
- The statistical distribution of trichostrongylid nematodes in grazing lambsInternational Journal for Parasitology, 1985
- Availability to grazing sheep of gastrointestinal nematode infection arising from summer contamination of pasturesAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1978