Extent of Overlap among Four Item Bias Methods
- 1 December 1982
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 42 (4), 1049-1066
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448204200412
Abstract
Four methods of item bias detection-transformed item difficulty, item discrimination expressed as Clemans' lambda, ChiSquare, and the three-parameter item characteristic curve-were studied to determine the degree of correspondence among them in identifying biased and unbiased items in reading and math subtests of the 1978 SRA Achievement Series. Intercorrelations among the four methods were moderate at best, confirming previous research involving different item bias analysis techniques. The item discrimination method showed the least correspondence with the other three methods. The extent of overlap between the four item bias methods in identifying biased items depends on the extent of bias in the items comprising the initial pool of items. That is, except for the item discrimination method, the item bias procedures identify similar sets of most biased items.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ITEM CONTENT AND GROUP MEMBERSHIP ON ACHIEVEMENT TEST ITEMSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1981
- A MONTE CARLO COMPARISON OF SEVEN BIASED ITEM DETECTION TECHNIQUESJournal of Educational Measurement, 1980
- A COMPARISON OF SEVERAL METHODS OF ASSESSING ITEM BIASJournal of Educational Measurement, 1979
- A METHOD OF ASSESSING BIAS IN TEST ITEMSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1979
- An Investigation of Item BiasEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1968
- An Index of Item-Criterion RelationshipEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1958
- The effect of difficulty and chance success on correlations between items or between testsPsychometrika, 1945