Intermediate Visual Acuity without Spectacles following Bilateral ReSTOR® Implantation
- 1 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in European Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 18 (5), 733-738
- https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210801800512
Abstract
Purpose This survey determined uncorrected visual acuity (VA) at near, intermediate, and far distances in cataract patients implanted with ReSTOR®, and assessed patient satisfaction. Methods Consecutive cataract patients implanted bilaterally with ReSTOR® were followed up at least 4 months. The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study scale was used to measure VA for near (40 cm), intermediate (50, 60, and 70 cm), and distance vision, with VAs expressed in logMAR and adjusted for distance using Bennett's (1993) formula. Satisfaction was self-rated on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (poor) to 10 (high). Results Twenty-four consecutive patients (mean age 67.6 years) were operated upon by a single surgeon and followed up for a mean of 336.5 days after second eye surgery. Average postoperative VAs for uncorrected distance were 0.06 logMAR and intermediate VAs were 0.21 logMAR at both 50 cm and 60 cm and 0.22 logMAR at 70 cm. These levels of uncorrected intermediate VA would allow patients to read Word® computer text in Times New Roman font 8 zoomed to 100%, at 70 cm from the monitor screen. The authors found that 23/24 patients (96%) no longer wore spectacles. The remaining patient required correction for astigmatism as this refraction error is not yet correctable by ReSTOR®. Average self-rated satisfaction was 8.54. Conclusions In an everyday surgical practice, none of the studied bilateral ReSTOR® cataract patients without astigmatism required spectacles when followed up 6 months or later. Intermediate VA was compatible with reading and led to high patient satisfaction.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- PSS38 PATIENTS' PERCEPTION OF LIFE FREE OF GLASSES AFTER CATARACT SURGERY: DEVELOPMENT OF THE FREEDOM FROM GLASSES VALUE SCALE (FGVS®)Value in Health, 2008
- Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lensesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2007
- A comparison of patient-reported outcomes from an apodized diffractive intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal intraocular lensCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2006
- ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: Quality of visionJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2006
- Visual and refractive status at different focal distances after implantation of the ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lensJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2006
- Visual Performance of AcrySof ReSTOR Apodized Diffractive IOL: A Prospective Comparative TrialAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2006
- European Multicenter Study of the AcrySof ReSTOR Apodized Diffractive Intraocular LensOphthalmology, 2006
- Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: A multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomesOphthalmology, 2000
- A prospective comparative study of the amo array zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lensOphthalmology, 1999
- Evaluation of a flexible one‐piece open‐loop anterior chamber lens ‘Symflex 350B’ 3–4 years after implantationActa Ophthalmologica, 1993