Mosquito (Dipteral Culicidae) flight behaviour near conspicuous objects
- 1 December 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Bulletin of Entomological Research
- Vol. 69 (4), 691-700
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007485300020228
Abstract
Field studies were conducted in Florida to investigate the behaviour of night-flying mosquitoes including Aedes sollicitans (Wlk.), Ae. taeniorhynchus (Wied.), Anopheles atropos D. & K., An. crucians Wied., Culex nigripalpus Theo., Culiseta melanura (Coq.), Deinocerites cancer Theo., Psorophora columbiae (D. & K.) and (Uranotaenia lowii Theo.) in relation to visually conspicuous objects. Adults of all species except Ae. sollicitans were taken in greater numbers in a large weathered plywood suction trap covered with black panels than in one without panels. However, both traps were attractive, as a transparent plastic suction trap covered with weathered plywood panels took larger numbers of all species except U. lowii than a transparent trap without panels. Buried suction traps furnished with visible risers (extensions) that made captures at 1·2 m elevations always captured proportionately larger numbers than buried traps with visible baffles that captured mosquitoes at ground level. A woodland species, C. nigripalpus, was captured in larger numbers toy traps furnisihed with visible risers and baffles than in traps furnished with transparent risers and baffles; however, collections of field species, e.g. Ae. taeniorhynchus, were smaller. The distribution of blood-fed and gravid females in collections from these traps provided some evidence that blood-seeking females are more responsive to visible objects than engorged or gravid females. These results are compatible with the hypotheses that (1) mosquitoes are attracted from a distance to visible objects, (2) in close proximity an avoidance action occurs and mosquitoes then pass over or around the visible object and (3) woodland species approach visible objects closely (<30 cm), whereas field species pass by at greater mean distances. Consequently, a larger percentage of visually attracted woodland mosquitoes than of visually attracted field species will be captured by suction traps. Depending upon trap design and specific behaviour, increasing the visibility of a suction trap can either increase or decrease trap collectionsThis publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- 10.1007/BF00344539Published by Test accounts ,2011
- The vertical distribution of flying mosquitoes (diptera, culicidae) in west african savannaBulletin of Entomological Research, 1975
- The direction of flight of mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae) near the ground in West African savanna in relation to wind direction, in the presence and absence of baitBulletin of Entomological Research, 1975
- The range of attraction of birds as baits for Some West African mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae)Bulletin of Entomological Research, 1974
- VISUAL ORIENTATION OF BLACK FLIES (SIMULIIDAE: DIPTERA) TO COLOUR, SHAPE AND MOVEMENT OF TARGETSEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1965
- Aspects of Insect VisionThe Canadian Entomologist, 1964
- Design and Efficiency of Mosquito Traps Based on Visual Response to PatternsThe Canadian Entomologist, 1960
- Studies of the Responses of the femaleAëdesmosquito. Part V. The Role of Visual FactorsBulletin of Entomological Research, 1952
- The use of Traps against Tsetse in West AfricaBulletin of Entomological Research, 1948
- The Visual Responses of Flying Mosquitoes.Journal of Zoology, 1940