Islet Allograft Rejection in Rats: a Time Course Study Characterizing Adhesion Molecule Expression, Mhc Expression, and Infiltrate Immunophenotypes
- 1 May 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Cell Transplantation
- Vol. 7 (3), 285-297
- https://doi.org/10.1177/096368979800700307
Abstract
Wistar Furth (RT1u) islets transplanted under the renal capsules of streptozotocin-diabetic Lewis (RT1l) rats reject after 5–6 days of normoglycemia. Hand-picked WF islets (1500–2000) were transplanted under the kidney capsules of diabetic Lew or WF rats. Rats bearing iso- or allografts were killed on posttransplant days 2, 4, and 6. Serial frozen sections of grafts and controls were stained by immunoperoxidase for rat MAC-1, class II MHC, CD2, CD4, CD8, B-cells, VLA-4, LFA-1, L-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1. Infiltrating cells, parenchymal cells, and endothelial cells in five distinct compartments (i.e., peritoneal reflection, subcapsular perivascular space, islet grafts, graft–kidney interface, and kidney) were evaluated for expression of the various markers at each interval. Significant infiltrates arrived in three distinct waves in both iso- and allografts. First, macrophages blanketed the peritoneal capsular reflection and infiltrated by day 2. Second, the first wave of lymphocytes arrived in the edematous subcapsular soft tissue via capsular vessels by day 2 (allo > iso). Third, the second wave of lymphocytes arrived from the renal parenchyma to form a dense band at the graft–kidney interface and around grafts by days 4 and 6 (allo >>> iso); CD4+ cells vastly outnumbered CD8+ cells, with CD4+ cells being mobilized first and from interstitial vessels throughout the entire kidney. CD8+ cells emigrated only from renal interstitial vessels adjacent to the graft. Large numbers of L-selectin+, VLA-4+, and LFA-1+ cells were seen in the infiltrates with the most intensely staining cells being intravascular. B-cells composed a very small proportion of infiltrating cells in both allo- and isografts. Endothelial staining for ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 was prominent throughout. Both class II MHC and ICAM-1 expression were induced on renal tubular epithelial cells, but neither was found on islet parenchymal cells. In conclusion, this study shows that islet allograft rejection is more complex than previously realized.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION OF ADHESION MOLECULES DURING RAT SMALL BOWEL ALLOGRAFT REJECTIONTransplantation, 1995
- THE MAIN INFILTRATING CELL IN XENOGRAFT REJECTION IS A CD4+ MACROPHAGE AND NOT A T LYMPHOCYTETransplantation, 1995
- Vascular addressins are induced on islet vessels during insulitis in nonobese diabetic mice and are involved in lymphoid cell binding to islet endothelium.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1993
- PRODUCTION OF CYTOKINES (TNF-ALPHA, IL-1-BETA) AND ENDOTHELIAL CELL ACTIVATION IN HUMAN LIVER ALLOGRAFT REJECTION1Transplantation, 1993
- IDENTIFICATION OF ICAM-1-POSITIVE CELLS IN THE NONGRAFTED AND TRANSPLANTED RAT KIDNEY—AN IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL AND ULTRASTRUCTURAL STUDYTransplantation, 1991
- Pancreas transplantationDiabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 1991
- HLA class II induction in human islet cells by interferon-γ plus tumour necrosis factor or lymphotoxinNature, 1987
- Transplantation of Pancreatic IsletsAnnual Review of Immunology, 1984
- THE USE OF FICOLL IN THE PREPARATION OF VIABLE ISLETS OF LANGERHANS FROM THE RAT PANCREASTransplantation, 1973