Assessing Significance of Physiological Differences among Three Esocids with a Bioenergefics Model
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Vol. 42 (1), 57-69
- https://doi.org/10.1139/f85-008
Abstract
To predict stocking success of esocids in Ohio [USA] waters with different thermal regimes, individual food consumption, conversion efficiency, growth, and metabolic rate were measured for Ohio stocks of northern pike (Esox lucius), muskellunge (E. masquinongy), and their hybrid, tiger muskellunge, in laboratory experiments. The first 3 parameters were quantified during 2-wk experiments of ad lib feeding on fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) at 7 constant temperatures (5, 15, 20, 22.5, 25, 27.5, and 30.degree. C). The food consumption and growth data suggest that northern pike should grow faster than muskellunge at cool temperatures (.ltoreq. 20.degree. C), but slower than muskellunge at warm temperatures (> 25.degree. C). Latitudinal differences in their natural distributions might explain this observation. Growth data of the hybrid showed no such obvious relationship to either of the parents. Metabolic rates were determined by measuring O2 consumption in a closed, static respirometer at 5 constant temperatures (5, 15, 20, 25, and 30.degree. C). There was little difference in metabolic rates among the 3 taxa. To examine these data further, a bioenergetics model that simulated different stocking conditions, both natural (thermal regime and prey availability) and human controlled (stocking size and date) was used. With this model, growth for 12-15 mo. after stocking was predicted. In general, summer-stocked fish were about 35-90% larger 15 mo. after stocking than were fall-stocked fish 12 mo. after stocking. More specifically, the combined effect of ration and temperature permitted hybrids to grow faster than the parents in all simulations. Northern pike grew larger than muskellunge in a cool system, but smaller than muskellunge in a warm system with summer stocking. Based on bioenergetic considerations, tiger muskellunge should outgrow both northern pike and muskellunge in thermal regimes common to Ohio waters.This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of temperature on production of tiger muskellunge in intensive cultureAquaculture, 1983
- Bioenergetics Model and Foraging Hypothesis for Sea Lamprey (Petromyzon marinus)Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1980
- Diel Activity Pattern and Swimming Speeds of Northern Pike (Esox lucius) in Lac Ste. Anne, AlbertaCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1980
- A Model for the Turnover of 137Cs and Potassium in Pike (Esox Lucius)Health Physics, 1978
- Applications of a Bioenergetics Model to Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens) and Walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum)Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1977
- Model for Accumulation of Methyl Mercury in Northern Pike Esox luciusOikos, 1974
- Corrections for Bias in Regression Estimates After Logarithmic TransformationEcology, 1973
- Experimental Determination of Food Consumption of pike, Esox lucius, for Growth and MaintenanceJournal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1966
- Thermal Resistance of Pike (Esox lucius L.), Muskellunge (E. masquinongy Mitchill), and their F1 HybridJournal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1964
- Some Considerations in the Study of Respiratory Metabolism in Fish, Particularly SalmonJournal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1962