Better blood pressure control: how to combine drugs
Open Access
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Human Hypertension
- Vol. 17 (2), 81-86
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001511
Abstract
Prospective comparisons of different drug classes have shown that differences in blood pressure control, rather than differences between drug classes, have the over-riding influence on overall outcome. The same studies have also reinforced the need, in the majority of patients, to use combinations of drugs in order to achieve the target of <140/85 mmHg. By contrast, most patients in routine practice receive single agents and consequently fail to achieve target blood pressure. This failure reflects in part the emphasis in individual studies and subsequent guidelines on comparison of individual drugs. In this article we show how the consistency of both theory and a broad range of evidence permits a didactic approach to combination therapy. Our advice is based on the growing recognition that essential hypertension and its treatment fall into two main categories. Younger Caucasians usually have renin-dependent hypertension that responds well to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition or angiotensin receptor blockade (A) or ß blockade (B). Most other patients have low-renin hypertension that responds better to calcium channel blockade (C) or diuretics (D). These latter drugs activate the renin system rendering patients responsive to the addition of renin suppressive therapy. Coincidence of the initials of these main drug classes with the first four letters of the alphabet permits an AB/CD rule, according to which recommended combinations are one drug from each of the ‘AB’ and ‘CD’ categories of drugs. However, the diabetogenic potential of the older ‘B’ and ‘D’ classes leads us to advise against combining ‘B’ and ‘D’ in older patients, and to recommend ‘A’ + ‘C’ + ‘D’ as standard triple therapy for resistant hypertension.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Effects of Ramipril on Ambulatory and Office Blood PressuresHypertension, 2001
- The St George's “Star” and “Imploding Diamond”Journal of Human Hypertension, 1999
- The ‘Birmingham Hypertension Square’ for the optimum choice of add-in drugs in the management of resistant hypertensionJournal of Human Hypertension, 1998
- The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressureArchives of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Hypertension awareness, treatment and control in the community: is the ‘rule of halves’ still valid?Journal of Human Hypertension, 1997
- Evidence-Based Health Policy—Lessons from the Global Burden of Disease StudyScience, 1996
- Long-term metabolic effects of antihypertensive drugsAmerican Heart Journal, 1994
- HIGH INCIDENCE OF PRIMARY ALDOSTERONISM IN 199 PATIENTS REFERRED WITH HYPERTENSIONClinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, 1994
- Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease *1Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution biasThe Lancet, 1990
- Antihypertensive beta blocking action as related to renin and age: A pharmacologic tool to identify pathogenetic mechanisms in essential hypertensionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1975