Meta-analysis: Unresolved issues and future developments
- 17 January 1998
- Vol. 316 (7126), 221-225
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7126.221
Abstract
Publication bias, discussed in detail in a previous article,11 is a major threat to the validity of meta-analysis. Obtaining and including data from unpublished studies seems to be the obvious way of avoiding this problem. Including data from unpublished studies can itself introduce bias, however. Even after extensive consultation with the research community, unpublished studies may remain hidden. The unpublished studies that can be located may thus be an unrepresentative sample of unpublished studies. Whether bias is reduced or increased by including unpublished studies cannot formally be assessed as it is impossible to be certain that all unpublished studies have been located. A further problem relates to the willingness of investigators of located unpublished studies to provide data. This may depend on the findings of the study, more favourable results being provided more readily. This could again bias the findings of a meta-analysis.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studiesBMJ, 1998
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1996
- Multiple Blinded Reviews of the Same Two ManuscriptsJAMA, 1994
- By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease?BMJ, 1994
- Should Unpublished Data Be Included in Meta-analyses?JAMA, 1993
- Meta-Analysis by the Confidence Profile Method: The Statistical Synthesis of EvidenceTechnometrics, 1993
- Effective and acceptable treatment for depression.BMJ, 1993
- Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference?The Lancet, 1993
- The Cantekin AffairPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- Subjectivity in data analysisThe Lancet, 1991