GUIDELINES FOR READING LITERATURE REVIEWS
- 15 April 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 138 (8), 697-703
Abstract
One strategy for dealing with the burgeoning medical literature is to rely on reviews of the literature. Although this strategy is efficient, readers may be misled if the review does not meet scientific standards. Therefore, guidelines that will help readers assess the scientific quality of the review are proposed. The guidelines focus on the definition of the question, the comprehensiveness of the search strategy, the methods of choosing and assessing the primary studies, and the methods of combining the results and reaching appropriate conclusions. Application of the guidelines will allow clinicians to spend their valuable reading time on high-quality material and to judge the validity of an author''s conclusions.This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confronting publication bias: A cohort design for meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- Our appropriate concern about hypokalemiaAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1984
- Determining causation—A case study: Adrenocorticosteroids and osteoporosisJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1984
- Glucocorticoid-Induced OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Association of Adrenocorticosteroid Therapy and Peptic-Ulcer DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Hemodynamic measurements in clinical practice: A decade in reviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983
- Our national obsession with potassiumAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1982
- Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trialsAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1982
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- Nonassociation of Adrenocorticosteroid Therapy and Peptic UlcerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976