Mastering the Art of Research Interviewing
- 1 November 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of General Psychiatry
- Vol. 38 (11), 1259-1262
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780360075007
Abstract
• A training program for researchers using standard clinical assessment procedures has been developed to enhance comparability of findings across studies through reducing critical sources of unreliability. The need for such a program is especially important in large multifacility collaborative studies in which the pooling of diagnostic and rating-scale data is planned. The program described here focuses on the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia and Research Diagnostic Criteria, two instruments widely used in clinical research. It consists of the following four phases of training: use of written case vignettes, videotaped interviews, in-person training interviews, and ongoing monitoring to maintain reliability. Checks on reliability are built into each successive phase of training. This program can serve as a model for training in the use of other standard interview assessment procedures requiring clinical judgment.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- The rating of symptoms by a psychiatrist and a non-psychiatrist: a study of patients referred from general practicePsychological Medicine, 1977
- Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- Studies of the Diagnostic Process: The Influence of Symptom Perception, Past Experience, and Ethnic Background on Diagnostic DecisionsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1969