Assessing Stenosis Significance by Coronary Arteriography: Are the Best Variables Good Enough?
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 12 (3), 692-693
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(88)80058-5
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: “A battered gold standard”Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Percent coronary stenosis: Battered gold standard, pernicious relic or clinical practicality?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Which Cineangiographically Assessed Anatomic Variable Correlates Best With Functional Measurements of Stenosis Severity? A Comparison of Quantitative Analysis of the Coronary Cineangiogram with Measured Coronary Flow Reserve and Exercise/Redistribution Thallium-201 ScintigraphyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- A perspective of coronary disease seen through the arteries of living man.Circulation, 1987
- Comparative study of coronary flow reserve, coronary anatomy and results of radionuclide exercise tests in patients with coronary artery diseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1986
- The radiographic assessment of coronary blood flow parameters.Circulation, 1985
- Coronary angiography during exercise-induced angina with ECG changesAmerican Heart Journal, 1984
- Does Visual Interpretation of the Coronary Arteriogram Predict the Physiologic Importance of a Coronary Stenosis?New England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS)Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1982
- Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1974