Characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support for >24 hrs*
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 33 (3), 520-526
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000155783.46747.04
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the characteristics of a large cohort of cancer patients receiving mechanical ventilation for >24 hrs and to identify clinical features predictive of in-hospital death. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Ten-bed oncologic medical-surgical intensive care unit. Patients: A total of 463 consecutive patients were included over a 45-month period. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Data were collected on the day of admission to the intensive care unit. The intensive care unit and hospital mortality rates were 50% and 64%, respectively. There were 359 (78%) patients with solid tumors and 104 (22%) with hematologic malignancies; 35 (8%) patients had leukopenia. Sepsis (63%), coma (15%), invasion or compression by tumor (11%), pulmonary embolism (7%), and cardiopulmonary arrest (6%) were the main reasons for mechanical ventilation. The independent unfavorable risk factors for mortality were older age (odds ratio, 3.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.61–5.93, for patients 40–70 yrs old, and odds ratio, 9.26; 95% confidence interval, 4.16–20.58, for patients >70 yrs old); performance status 3–4 (odds ratio, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.40–4.51); cancer recurrence/progression (odds ratio, 3.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.81–6.53); Pao2/Fio2 ratio <150 (odds ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.40–4.99); Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (excluding respiratory domain, each 4 points; odds ratio, 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.70–3.24); and airway/pulmonary invasion or compression by tumor as a reason for mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 5.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.92–17.08). Conclusions: Severity of acute organ failures, poor performance status, cancer status, and older age were the main determinants of mortality. The appropriate use of such easily available clinical characteristics may avoid forgoing intensive care for patients with a chance of survival.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved survival in cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support: Impact of noninvasive mechanical ventilatory supportCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- Noninvasive Ventilation in Immunosuppressed Patients with Pulmonary Infiltrates, Fever, and Acute Respiratory FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Outcome and prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 2000
- Changing use of intensive care for hematological patients:Intensive Care Medicine, 1999
- Outcomes of Critically Ill Cancer Patients in a University Hospital SettingAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1999
- Outcome for Cancer Patients Requiring Mechanical VentilationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Mechanical ventilation in critically ill cancer patients: outcome and utilisation of resources.Supportive Care in Cancer, 1999
- Effect of a Protective-Ventilation Strategy on Mortality in the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Intensive Care, Survival, and Expense of Treating Critically III Cancer PatientsJAMA, 1993