Left ventricular ejection performance and systolic muscle function in patients with mitral stenosis.
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 67 (1), 148-154
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.67.1.148
Abstract
The status of systolic left ventricular (LV) performance in patients with isolated mitral stenosis (MS) is controversial. Potential alterations in LV architecture as well as loading conditions may have complex effects on LV ejection performance and muscle function. Hemodynamic and angiographic LV ejection indexes (ejection fraction [EF], velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (Vcf) and stroke work index [SWI]), the level of preload (end-diastolic volume index [EDVI]), afterload (end-systolic wall stress [ESS]) and an index of LV contractile function thought to be independent of loading conditions (end-systolic wall stress/end-systolic volume index [ESS/ESVI]) were determined in 9 normal subjects and 16 patients with isolated MS. Although the EF in patients with MS (0.59 .+-. 0.03) was not statistically different from that in normal subjects (0.66 .+-. 0.04) (mean .+-. SEM [standard error of the mean]), 31% of MS patients had an EF < 0.50. Vcf was lower in MS patients than in normal subjects (1.01 .+-. 0.06 vs. 1.32 .+-. 0.10 s-1, P < 0.01), as were SWI (45.0 .+-. 2.9 vs. 69.1 .+-. 3.9 g-m/m2 P < 0.001) and EDVI (71.3 .+-. 5.2 vs. 93.0 .+-. 3.9 ml/m2 P < 0.005). ESVI was similar in MS patients and normal subjects (29.5 .+-. 3.6 vs. 33.0 .+-. 3.6 ml/m2), whereas stroke volume index (SVI) was lower in MS patients (41.8 .+-. 2.8 vs. 61.6 .+-. 4.4 ml/m2 P < 0.001). On the basis of ejection performance, MS patients were divided into 2 groups. Patients with normal ejection performance (MSNEP) had EF > 0.50 and Vcf > 1.00 s-1. Patients with reduced ejection performance (MSREP) had EF < 0.50 or Vcf < 1.00 s-1. MSREP patients had higher ESS (157 .+-. 19 dyn .cntdot. 103/cm2) than MSNEP (107 .+-. 11 dyn .cntdot. 103/cm2) (P < 0.025), yet EDVI was similar in MSREP (70.6 .+-. 7.8 ml/m2) and MSNEP (72.0 .+-. 7.3 ml/m2). ESS/ESVI in MS patients was not different from that in normal subjects (5.3 .+-. 0.5 vs. 5.2 .+-. 0.8 dyn .cntdot. 103 .cntdot. m2/cm5). Even 4 of 5 MS patients with EF < 0.50 and 6 MS patients with Vcf < 1.00 s-1 had a normal ESS/ESVI. Apparently, MS patients as a group have reduced ejection performance and reduced preload. The reduction in ejection performance is due to increased afterload without adequate Frank-Starling compensation. LV muscle function is normal in most MSREP patients.This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of preoperative left ventricular function in patients with mitral regurgitation: value of the end-systolic wall stress-end-systolic volume ratio.Circulation, 1981
- Hemodynamic response to exercise after propranolol in patients with mitral stenosisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1979
- Left ventricular function before and following surgical treatment of mitral valve diseaseAmerican Heart Journal, 1979
- Contractile state of the left ventricle in man as evaluated from end-systolic pressure-volume relations.Circulation, 1977
- The state of the left ventricular myocardium in mitral stenosisAmerican Heart Journal, 1977
- Myocardial dysfunction associated with valvular heart diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1972
- Quantitative AngiocardiographyCirculation, 1970
- Determination of left ventricular wall thickness by angiocardiographyAmerican Heart Journal, 1969
- Architectonics of the heartAmerican Heart Journal, 1953
- Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. IAmerican Heart Journal, 1951