Quality Assessment of Colonoscopic Cecal Intubation: An Analysis of 6 Years of Continuous Practice at a University Hospital
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 101 (4), 721-731
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00494.x
Abstract
Despite increased emphasis on endoscopic performance indicators, e.g., cecal intubation rates, limited data from actual clinical practice have been published. Retrospective database review to determine the rate and documentation of cecal intubation during colonoscopy at the University of Maryland Medical Center. We reviewed 5,477 consecutive colonoscopies performed by 10 faculty gastroenterologists at a University hospital over a 6-yr period (March 1, 1999 to February 28, 2005). Unadjusted cecal intubation rates were analyzed as were rates that were adjusted based on the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer recommendations. We analyzed trends in overall and individual cecal intubation rates, circumstances that impact these rates, and the quality of documentation of cecal intubation. The overall adjusted cecal intubation rate for the entire 6 yr was 90.3%, and increased over the study period with the highest adjusted rate (93.7%) in the most recent year studied. There was no correlation between cecal intubation rate and patient age, gastroenterology fellow involvement, or endoscopist experience and number of procedures/year. In contrast, colon cancer screening, male gender, outpatient colonoscopy, and adequate bowel preparation predicted a higher cecal intubation rate. Written and photographic documentation of cecal intubation improved significantly after 2002. Our analysis revealed cecal intubation and documentation rates that meet current guidelines, and identified factors that may cause substantial variance in these rates depending on the nature of the practice. The present analysis confirms that computerized databases can be used to assess individual and group cecal intubation and documentation rates on an annual basis, and to make these data available to the public.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Survey of Credentialing Practices of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Centers in the United StatesJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2005
- Quality of Care in Gastroenterology: Beyond the Bell CurveGastroenterology, 2005
- Three Challenges: Propofol, Colonoscopy by Undertrained Physicians, and CT ColonographyAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005
- Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention TrialGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005
- Quality and colonoscopy: a new imperativeGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005
- Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: A population-based analysisGastroenterology, 2004
- Colonoscopy: Practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopistsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2003
- Feasibility of colonoscopy screening: Discussion of issues and recommendations regarding implementationGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2001
- Medical-Legal Risks of Incident Cancers After Clearing ColonoscopyAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2001
- Failure of colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer: evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitalsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997