Development and testing of a general amber force field
Top Cited Papers
- 13 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Vol. 25 (9), 1157-1174
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20035
Abstract
We describe here a general Amber force field (GAFF) for organic molecules. GAFF is designed to be compatible with existing Amber force fields for proteins and nucleic acids, and has parameters for most organic and pharmaceutical molecules that are composed of H, C, N, O, S, P, and halogens. It uses a simple functional form and a limited number of atom types, but incorporates both empirical and heuristic models to estimate force constants and partial atomic charges. The performance of GAFF in test cases is encouraging. In test I, 74 crystallographic structures were compared to GAFF minimized structures, with a root‐mean‐square displacement of 0.26 Å, which is comparable to that of the Tripos 5.2 force field (0.25 Å) and better than those of MMFF 94 and CHARMm (0.47 and 0.44 Å, respectively). In test II, gas phase minimizations were performed on 22 nucleic acid base pairs, and the minimized structures and intermolecular energies were compared to MP2/6‐31G* results. The RMS of displacements and relative energies were 0.25 Å and 1.2 kcal/mol, respectively. These data are comparable to results from Parm99/RESP (0.16 Å and 1.18 kcal/mol, respectively), which were parameterized to these base pairs. Test III looked at the relative energies of 71 conformational pairs that were used in development of the Parm99 force field. The RMS error in relative energies (compared to experiment) is about 0.5 kcal/mol. GAFF can be applied to wide range of molecules in an automatic fashion, making it suitable for rational drug design and database searching. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 25: 1157–1174, 2004Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validationJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2002
- How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules?Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2000
- An improved force field (MM4) for saturated hydrocarbonsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 1996
- Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94Journal of Computational Chemistry, 1996
- A comparison of conformational energies calculated by several molecular mechanics methodsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 1996
- Application of the multimolecule and multiconformational RESP methodology to biopolymers: Charge derivation for DNA, RNA, and proteinsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 1995
- Application of RESP charges to calculate conformational energies, hydrogen bond energies, and free energies of solvationJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1993
- A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP modelThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1993
- Macromodel—an integrated software system for modeling organic and bioorganic molecules using molecular mechanicsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 1990
- Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force fieldJournal of Computational Chemistry, 1989