Does the peritoneum need to be closed at laparotomy?
- 1 October 1977
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 64 (10), 733-736
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800641013
Abstract
Closure of vertical laparotomy wounds was randomized between a two-layer technique of continuous catgut to peritoneum and continuous nylon to sheath and a one-layer technique in which the peritoneal suture line was omitted. In 162 two-layer closures there were 4 burst abdomens and 7 wound hernias (6·8 per cent wound failures); in 164 one-layer closures there were 5 burst abdomens and 7 hernias (7·3 per cent failures). Of 21 patients in this series with jaundice, the abdominal wounds dehisced in 3, and 4 patients developed incisional hernias (33·3 per cent failures) compared with a 5·2 per cent failure rate in the 305 non-jaundiced patients (P < 0·01). Closure of the peritoneum as a separate layer, as widely advised and practised, appears to play no significant role in the healing of the laparotomy wound.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Jaundice and wound healing: An experimental studyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1976
- Visceral and parietal suture in abdominal surgeryThe American Journal of Surgery, 1976
- Abdominal Wound DehiscenceArchives of Surgery, 1973
- Layered and mass closure of the abdominal wall: A theoretical and experimental analysisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1970
- II. Incidence of Wound Disruption Following OperationArchives of Surgery, 1970
- A Clinical and Laboratory Study of Abdominal Wound Closure and DehiscenceArchives of Surgery, 1969
- Wound DehiscenceArchives of Surgery, 1966
- ABDOMINAL WOUND DISRUPTIONThe Lancet, 1965
- The Burst AbdomenBMJ, 1963
- The aetiology of post-operative abdominal adhesions an experimental studyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1962